Clinical evidence

Evidence across the
CKD anaemia journey

The OXEMIA® (Desidustat) clinical evidence programme spans
transformed Phase III studies in non-dialysis and dialysis settings,
systematic reviews and guideline context, and real-world evidence.
Important outcomes remain uncertain and evidence certainty
for some endpoints has been rated low or very low.

This site is intended for healthcare professionals.
1

Evidence map

Explore studies and resources by evidence type or setting.

Phase III trial

DREAM-ND (India)

Desidustat vs darbepoetin alfa
in non-dialysis CKD anaemia

n=36824 weeks2021
PublishedView summary
NDD-CKD

DREAM-D (India)

Desidustat vs erythropoietin alfa
in dialysis-dependent CKD

n=34324 weeks2021
PublishedView summary
EPO-CS

China Phase III

Desidustat vs placebo in
non-dialysis CKD anaemia

n=40124 weeks2021
PublishedView summary
INDO-CKD

Gulati et al. (2026)

Multicenter retrospective study in
INDO and CD cohorts

n=10486 months2025
PublishedView summary
Systematic review

NDD-CKD systematic
review (Tyagi et al., 2025)

12 RCTs, 8611 participants

n=86112025
PublishedView summary
View all evidence
2

Pivotal programme overview

A comparison of the key clinical trials that evaluate desidustat.

DREAM-ND (India)
DREAM-D (India)
China Phase III
Population
Non-dialysis CKD (stages 3–5)
adults with anaemia
Dialysis-dependent CKD
adults with anaemia
Non-dialysis CKD adults
with anaemia
Study design / comparator
Randomised, open-label, active-controlled
vs darbepoetin alfa
Randomised, open-label, active-controlled
vs epoetin alfa
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-
controlled
Sample size
n=368
n=343
n=401
Duration
24 weeks
24 weeks
12 weeks
Primary endpoint
Non-inferiority for change in
haemoglobin (Hb)
Non-inferiority for change in
haemoglobin (Hb)
Hb correction, response and
target attainment
Status
Published (2021)
Published (2021)
Published (2021)
3

Key evidence and resources

In addition to the pivotal trials, important context is provided by systematic reviews, guidelines and real-world studies.

Systematic review

NDD-CKD systematic
review (Tyagi et al., 2025)

12 RCTs (n=8611) evaluating HIF-PHIs
for anaemia in NDD-CKD.

Findings support HIF-PHIs as alternatives
to ESAs; evidence certainty generally
low or very low.

Review insights
Guideline context

South Asia HIF-PHI
Guideline (2023)

Includes practice recommendations
for NDD and DD patients.

Desidustat might be offered as an
alternative to ESAs for appropriate
patients, when regulatory
requirements are met.

Read guideline summary
Real-world evidence

Gulati et al. (2026)
Real-world study

Multicenter retrospective study in CKD
patients including dialysis recipients.

Outcomes include Hb change in
Month 6 and dialysis vs routine practice.

Explore real-world study
Emerging research

Emerging research
(HCP access)

Observational transplant study,
PRCA case series and B19V series.

New-interventional data. Not for use
in treatment decisions.

Go to research library
4

Evidence gaps

Areas where more and better-quality evidence is needed.

Long-term
cardiovascular
outcomes
MACE and
MACE-plus data
Fatigue and
quality-of-life
outcomes
Transfusion and
progression-to-ESKD
outcomes
Longer-term Phase IV
and cost-effectiveness
research
5

Continue exploring

Find what you need next.